III)     From the Variation with the father of deceased namely Muhammad Iqbal (complainant of second version) fatal injury was attributed to Allah Ditta son of Haqnawaz and role attributed into the petitioner and others was simple presence with aerial firing without any injury to deceased or PWs.

93 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, it is also a effectively-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, use to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary obtain support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is subject matter towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, for the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to re-respect the evidence and to reach at its independent findings within the evidence.

A survey of PACER end users, conducted in 2021, measured consumer satisfaction and identified areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office on the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To guage and prioritize future changes to PACER services and features.

Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 5066/2024 (D.B.) Ayaz Hussain and 432 Others V/S Province of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-224033 Tag:Presented the legal analysis on the subject issue, we are from the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their initial contract appointment and seniority and promotion thereon, from that angle is not legally seem, Other than promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject matter to rules and regulations When the recruitment rules of the topic post permit the case from the petitioners for promotion may be deemed, however, we've been obvious inside our point of view that contractual service cannot be considered for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment 489 f case laws and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, subject matter to availability of vacancy subject matter to the approval in the competent authority.

ninety four . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It can be very well-settled that the civil servants must first go after internal appeals within 90 days. In the event the appeal is not decided within that timeframe, he/she will be able to then tactic the service tribunal to challenge the initial order. Once they do so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, as being the 90 days to the department to act has already expired. Over the aforesaid proposition, we are guided with the decision from the Supreme Court during the case of Dr.

The different roles of case regulation in civil and common regulation traditions create differences in just how that courts render decisions. Common law courts generally explain in detail the legal rationale driving their decisions, with citations of both legislation and previous relevant judgments, and sometimes interpret the broader legal principles.

The ruling with the first court created case law that must be followed by other courts right up until or Except both new regulation is created, or even a higher court rules differently.

In any society, the enforcement of regulation and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. Among the list of most critical crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 of your Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is very important to be sure justice prevails.

Usually, only an appeal accepted because of the court of last vacation resort will resolve this sort of differences and, For several reasons, these types of appeals are sometimes not granted.

Although a lot of websites offer free case legislation, not all are equally reliable. It’s vital to evaluate the credibility of your source before relying on the information.

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses like self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which may well bring about reduced charges or acquittal.

In order to prove murder, there has to be an intention to cause the death of that person along with the action of actually injuring them – and that injury subsequently leading to and causing the death of that person.

The latest amendment to this section signifies the legislature’s dedication to maximizing the effectiveness of the law in tackling contemporary challenges related to counterfeiting.

dismissed as not pressed and sentences awarded for the appellant in this case is altered into imprisonment, which appellant has already undergone.(Criminal Jail Appeal )